August 4, 2011

Club reacts to fan criticism, changes away kit sponsor applique



In a highly commendable move, the club has taken on board criticism of the needlessly large black sponsor patch on the away shirt and changed the way the wordmark is shown. No longer will Cash Converters’ brand mark be in white on a black background, instead the text will appear in black with a white outline on the light blue shirt.

We’ve been quite vociferous in our contempt for the sponsorship deal and the deleterious impact a chogging great patch has on the aesthetic value of an otherwise decent looking kit set, so we applaud this move even if we still don’t like the negative connotations that go with advertising a hock shop, global in reach or not. It had been noted that even though Motherwell have the same sub-prime sponsor, their kits hadn’t been visually sullied by use of a patch, which in the case of our away shirt was so vast, so high up the chest that it dominated and spoiled a good looking away shirt. Thanks for listening Hull City*.

Sadly, the decision to change came too late for the home shirt, which is already on sale from Tiger Leisure, but you can always try boil-washing it off**.

* Can we use the amber socks worn against Bradford, and part of the original adidas design, for every home game too please? Mwah.

**Amber Nectar is not responsible for the results if you actually try this


Filed under: Kit Reviews,News — Les @ 2:42 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



July 16, 2011

The verdict on the new away shirt is…


…as expected, ‘lovely design tainted by a hideous sponsor patch’.

The ethics of having Cash Converters as a sponsor has been debated to death, so we won’t retread old ground here, instead let’s focusing on the aesthetic impact of their logo on the new away shirt.

Having Cash Converters’ logo in a black patch wasn’t strictly necessary on the home shirt, white text against black and amber stripes is easily readable, it was distinctive enough when Karoo’s wordmark was on the 2008/2009 shirt, ditto Totesport’s URL last season. Having the same patch on the away shirt is just wanton ruination of a lovely shirt, it completely dominates* all other detail on such a subtle coloured garment. The text alone in black would have looked infinitely better, the only reason you’d use the black patch is to save money by using the same ones as used on the home shirt.

Compare the sponsor on our away shirt to that on West Brom’s, which uses the same adidas template. Even with superfluous Chinese characters their sponsor’s logo looks better for not using a patch. The shirt itself is lovely, a simple affair with alternating matte/shiny hoops, and light blue has some historical connection to Hull City as we wore it immediately post WW2 when the Board of Trade deemed amber (or orange as Harold Needler wanted) dye too expensive as the country adapted to peacetime.

Perhaps the only benefit of the patch is it allows the sponsor to be blacked out with gaffer tape better should you wish to show you’re a Cash Converters concientious objector, or maybe it’ll peel off after a few washes. White shorts and light blue socks complete the kit, which could have been an absolute classic without the blight of the black patch.

Oh and the less said about the way we revealed the shirt the better. Swansea invited fans into the stadium to see the full team line up in their new adidas away kit, we ask fans to hunt round the city centre to search for something they’ve never seen before and post hastily taken photos on Facebook. Marketing fail.

*It’s worth noting that the sponsor patch on the Cameron Stewart modelled shirt looks considerably smaller than the one being shown in the City Centre. Cameron’s looks to have been digitally added onto a plain shirt. Can we have the plain one please?

Filed under: Kit Reviews — Les @ 4:05 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



March 10, 2011

KIT REVIEW – 2010/2011


The ousting of Hull City chairman Paul Duffen in October 2009 brought an abrupt end to a period of reckless spending that saddled the club with dangerously high levels of debt.

The ability to service that debt was significantly impaired by relegation from the Premier League at the end of the 2009/2010 season and the resulting precipitous drop in television revenues, heightening the imperative for belt tightening and cost cutting.

Following Duffen out of the door were many players signed during his tenure on eye-watering salaries that had the accountant liberally applying red ink to the books, as the club attempted to make ends meet.

Replica shirt sales could have generated some much needed income during the idle summer months but that opportunity was denied because of another misjudgement by the syrup wearing Southerner.

After Duffen had negotiated a deal for German sportswear goliath adidas to replace Umbro as kit supplier, he approved mass production of a prototype home shirt that was black and a very un-Cityesque yellow gold rather than amber. (more…)

Filed under: Kit Reviews — Les @ 8:30 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



January 4, 2010

KIT REVIEW – 2009/2010


A second season in the Premier League for Hull City, who’d have thunk it?

The Tigers’ first top flight campaign had been somewhat Icarus like, we flew close to the sun (third in the league table if you’ll indulge the metaphor) early on and our wings made of wax melted, leaving us plummeting towards the ground (the relegation spots). However, we would narrowly avoid impact with the floor and defy all expectations by retaining top flight status at Newcastle’s expense, meaning the Geordies and not us would trade triangular Premier League sleeve patches for rectangular Football League appliqués for their 2009-2010 kits.

The club’s deal with Umbro was entering its third and final year, but their new offerings would not bear the brand marks of the KCOM group as the last two years Umbro City shirts had. The  Karoo / Kingston Communications shirt deal had expired and in the midst of an economic slump they elected not to renew, though their stadium naming rights deal would continue.

Sports360, an agency specialising in brokering pitchside advertising deals for professional sports clubs, were tasked with finding a suitably high profile company to sponsor the still Premier League Tigers.

Our new main sponsor would be ToteSport, the high street and internet trading arm of the Horseracing Totalisator Board, the state controlled bookmakers. The two year deal was announced on June 30th 2009, the same day the new playing kits (the home kit is seen on Kamil Zayatte, above) were unveiled.   (more…)

Filed under: Kit Reviews — Les @ 10:00 am

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



November 12, 2009

KIT REVIEW – 1994/1995


geeknight

In any other season, going out on a festive ‘Geek night’ (as evidenced by Jimmy Graham and Linton Brown, above) might represent a sartorial nadir for City’s players, not so in 1994-1995, when heavy knit sweater vests and half mast trousers represented an aesthetic improvement on what the players wore in games. (more…)

Filed under: Kit Reviews — Les @ 1:06 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



August 25, 2009

KIT REVIEW – 2002/2003 & 2003/2004


0204hA premature end to the Sportscard deal left Hull City searching for a new main sponsor, and with a new sponsor comes a new set of kits. It was a shame to see the classy V-neck shirt of 2001-2002 dispensed with after just one season, but Patrick were obliged to design a replacement to carry the logotype of local electrical component suppliers Bonus, who reprised main sponsorship of the Tigers having had their name splashed on the Matchwinner made shirts of the early 1990′s, including the legendary/infamous ‘tiger skin’ jersey.

The new home kit would see active service for two full seasons (as Patrick’s first design was intended to) though it appeared in three distinct league campaigns having been unveiled and used at the end of 2001-2002. While not the most memorable of outfits from an aesthetic point of view, this kit has the unique distinction of being worn in competition at both Boothferry Park and the newly built Kingston Communications Stadium as well as being the primary uniform for our first promotion season in 19 years.  The new strip kept with the amber shirts/black shorts/ amber socks combination while adding a small amount of white trim.   (more…)

Filed under: Kit Reviews — Les @ 8:00 am

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



June 20, 2009

KIT REVIEW – 1995/1996 & 1996/1997


After narrowly missing out on the play offs for two seasons running, the Tiger Nation hoped it would be a case of third time lucky for City in 1995-1996.

Ditching kit maker Pelada and their vile interpretation of tiger striped shirts, the club changed manufacturers, inviting Burnley based sportswear firm The Glory Years, who made Rochdale, Brighton, and Chesterfield’s kits as part of their ‘Super League’ brand, to design and make the Tigers attire for the next two somewhat eventful seasons.

Our new togs were throwbacks of sorts, visually similar to the to the heavy cotton drill garb worn by City in the late 1940′s , The Tigers wore sky blue and white as a post-war austerity measure as amber dye was deemed too expensive, the club returned to wearing amber and black in 1947.

Like that post-war kit the new strip was made up of plain amber shirts, black shorts and amber socks. Jerseys were not used to advertise the wares and services of sponsors back then of course, but compared to the tiger-skin shirted excesses of the previous four years, the new kit was a much more traditional effort.  (more…)

Filed under: Kit Reviews — Les @ 10:39 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



April 25, 2009

2008-2009 in Tiger attire


Players customising their kit and wearing accessories is by no means a new thing, consider Steve Terry’s headband or Theodore Whitmore’s cycling shorts from years past. There has definitely been an exponential increase in accoutrement use since our promotion to the Premier League, however. From compression jerseys to branded gloves, we look at the optional extras worn by Tigers players and staff during 2008/2009.




City branded gloves

‘Mercurial’ Frenchman Bernard Mendy started the trend of wearing these £4.99 from Tiger Leisure, 100% acrylic HCAFC knitted gloves, an act soon copied by Geovanni, Kamil Zayatte, Marlon King and George Boateng.

Mendy wore unbranded plain black gloves at home to West Brom, but soon went back to City gloves. Kamil Zayatte continued wearing them well into March, when it wasn’t even remotely cold. Ian Ashbee doesn’t appear to be a fan.   (more…)

Filed under: Articles,Kit Reviews — Les @ 10:40 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



April 8, 2009

Kit review – 2008/2009


In the annals of English sport, Hull City were a mere footnote until 2008. The sum of 104 years of professional football in Hull was seemingly just the answer to a pub quiz question, that being ‘which is the largest city in Europe to have never had a top flight football club?’ All that, however, changed on May 24th 2008, when the Tigers made the ascent to the Premier League.

Overnight, the club’s profile increased exponentially to hitherto unseen levels. City, who once only made national headlines for narrowly staving off bankruptcy, were now being touted as a ’global brand’ that could shift a glut of replica shirts in the Far East. Blimey.

With the eyes of the world now supposedly upon us, breath was bated in anticipation of a high profile kit launch.

In the past, the release of a new home kit may have warranted a photograph on the back page of the Hull Daily Mail at the most, not any more. A ‘global brand’ has teaser campaigns, pre ordering and press conferences to mark the arrival of new polyester garments.  During the summer, Umbro ran a series of ‘teaser’ adverts on both the club’s official website and Tiger Leisure webstore. (more…)

Filed under: Kit Reviews — Les @ 1:59 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



February 13, 2009

Kit review – 1999/2000


With City’s Football League membership secured, for another year at least, courtesy of the Warren Joyce inspired ‘Great Escape’, a huge wave of possibly unfounded optimism washed over East Yorkshire as attention turned to the 1999-2000 season.

The club’s fairly new owners declared that the team’s performances as they staved off relegation in the latter half of 1998-1999 were ‘promotion form’ and that if replicated we could be leaving the basement division via the promotion hatch, rather than the relegation trapdoor, putting somewhat unfair pressure on the rookie manager.

The club ditched Olympic and their vile ‘spilt Tango’ shirt and installed Avec as the new kit manufacturer. Avec had previously made shirts for  Sheffield United, and since City’s new commercial manager had held the same role at Bramall Lane, it was perhaps inevitable he would use a company he was familiar with to produce playing and training wear for the next two seasons.

For the first time, the design of the Tigers’ on-field apparel was decided by a supporter ballot. A matchday programme late in the 1998-1999 season featured images of four kits, three designed by Avec, and one by the nepotistically appointed nephew of crooked (and convicted company law criminal) Vice President, Stephen Leonard Hinchliffe.

That design (choice D) was tremendously naff, featuring childish spiky tiger stripes randomly scattered across a plain round necked amber shirt.

Alleged graphic design student James Hinchliffe’s reviled club crest was also present, featuring a tiger’s head seemingly comprised of a clipart crab with a circumcised penis for a nose. That logo also blemished the three Avec designs, all of which were neat and aesthetically pleasing, club crest notwithstanding.

The four kit vote choices as they appeared in the matchday programme

The four kit vote choices as they appeared in the matchday programme. The shirt of kit choice A was mostly amber, with a black stripe running along the shoulder yoke, and a black V-neck collar with white and amber trim. Kit B’s jersey was also plain amber, with black ‘shard’ shapes on the arms, and a curvy, tapering stripe on the left side of the chest.

The winner though was Kit C, a lovely, bold striped affair (as worn by Gary Brabin, top left). The conceptual drawing featured a raglan sleeved, black V-necked shirt with amber and white trim, and the inner stripes were cut off mid-chest so the sponsor’s typeface sat on a plain amber section. Other details included the Avec logo printed into the material (though the club crest patch was sewn on), a stitched on rectangular ‘authentic merchandise’ tag at the bottom left of the front panel (which termed us Hull City FC rather than AFC), and a small red ‘Avec sport’ tag on the right side seams.

Kit C won with 34% of votes, we used this plain 'amber' strip till it was ready

Kit C won with 34% of votes, we used this plain ‘amber’ strip till it was ready Though the initial designs had the wordmark of the University of Hull within a black box on the chest, the esteemed house of learning decided in the summer that their sponsorship deal had ran its course and they’d not be renewing, so IBC took their place, becoming main club sponsor for a second time, having had their logo on City’s jerseys between 1995 and 1997. You would have thought the haulage firm’s initials in red would have looked out of place and sullied the black and amber striped jersey, but not so, it looked fine and rather striking.

The name of the club’s principal commercial partner was not the only change from the original design evident on the shirts that went on sale at that summer’s open day, these were crew necked, and not as originally advertised, V-necked. A new element, unable to be shown on the crude, original rendering was a discreet plaid weave pattern that ran throughout both the jersey and shorts, though it was more pronounced on the pants. The shorts and socks, completing the home kit ensemble, were both black and trimmed with one white and one amber stripe matching the design on the shirts’ collar.

Close-ups of the makers logo, Hinchliffe crest, sponsor, sewn hem patch and seam tag

Close-ups of the maker's logo, Hinchliffe crest, sponsor, sewn hem patch and seam tag

Close-ups of the maker’s logo, Hinchliffe crest, sponsor, sewn hem patch and seam tag The full, first choice kit was not worn until 10th August in a League Cup first round, first leg tie away to Rotherham. The new strip was not available to wear in pre-season (due to the late sponsor change), instead we faced Bradford City, North Ferriby, Winsford, Bury and Scarborough wearing an odd all amber (though it was a very pale, washed out amber) pyjama resembling outfit that bore no club crest or sponsors logo, and the only distinguishing marks were Avec’s name on the jerseys and their stylised letter A (which looks like it was designed by Klingon calligraphers) on each sock at shin level.

Not the start of a purple patch

Not the start of a purple patch

Though the Tigers sported their new striped shirts at Exeter on the first day of the new League campaign, our kit man evidently hadn’t realised that the Grecians wear black shorts and socks, so City were compelled to wear the Exe-Men’s away pants and legwear (as seen on Colin Alcide, right).

On a brilliantly sunny day, those hardy Tiger Nationals who’d ventured South-Westwards looked on aghast, as their team, looking foolish in amber and black shirts paired with deep purple shorts and socks, succumbed to a 1-0 defeat.

The season’s opening day wasn’t the only time City played away wearing purple socks in 1999-2000, though thankfully the other occasions didn’t necessitate us going on the scrounge, as the regal tone was the primary colour of that season’s change kit.

This strip (as seen on Mark Greaves, below left) was lovely, and ranks among the most visually pleasant away kits that the Tigers have ever worn.

The purple jersey featured an overlapping V-neck collar with white stripe trim, and the shirt’s raglan sleeves had red piping stitched in between the body and arm panels. Whereas the home shirt had the red IBC logotype woven into the fabric, the away top had each letter separately heat bonded onto the chest in felt.

Another difference was Avec’s logo, embroidered in white cotton here rather than woven in as on the first choice jersey. As on the home kit there was a black and amber ‘authentic merchandise’ tag at the base of the shirt (right side) that wasn’t seen if the player tucked his shirt into his shorts, and a small red ‘Avec sport’ tag on the left side seam.

The away shorts were white with a thick purple stripe, flanked by red piping, on each side. Red drawstrings were visible as they exited the elasticated waistband on the outside of the shorts rather than the inside.

The plaid weave shadow pattern of the home shirt and shorts was also evident on those of the change kit. The socks were purple with one white and one red stripe on the turnover band and at shin level was Avec’s ‘Klingon A’ symbol, woven in. First worn mid September at Torquay, the delicious change strip was later used at Barnet, Hayes (F.A. Cup), Shrewsbury and Mansfield.

The two keeper jerseys, one green and one blue, were identical in design, each with lighter shaded bands across the chest in which sat the sponsor’s logo, and a grid design across the shoulders and upper chest. Steve Wilson (seen right) preferred the green version, while red card collector Lee Bracey favoured the blue effort.

1999-2000 saw the introduction of squad numbers and player’s names on the back of shirts for Football League teams. The Premier League had adopted the practice back in its second season, 1993-1994, initially allowing teams to choose their own number and lettering styles before introducing a homogenised typeface (a stylised, squished version of Optima Black, font fans) for the 1997-1998 season that was used for ten years.

The Football League was, for many years resistant to the idea of squad numbers and player names on the shirts, implying that players would become egotistical should they suddenly have their surnames displayed on their backs.

They had a volte face change of heart in 1999 though, and cited one of the reasons as an attempt to create ‘local heroes’. Hmm.

The typeface, design ed by Sportin g i-D (formerly Chris Kay International, suppliers of garment appliques to FIFA, UEFA, the FA, adidas, Nike and, ahem, the SPL) was a bold, clean and easy to read font, certainly compared to the deformed looking Premier League letters and numbers. At the base of each number was the Football League’s logo.

White letters and numbers were used on both the home and away shirts and the home shorts had smaller white numbers on the left side above the manufacturer’s mark, though the corresponding numbers on the white away shorts were red, to match the sponsors patch and trim of the purple and white strip.

Because both home and away shirts featured raglan sleeves, the letters making up player surnames were usually applied radially arched on both kits, though mid-season signing Ian Goodison’s away shirt had horizontally placed letters that, because of surname length, began underneath the arms, midway down the shirt. Misapplied lettering aside, the Avec kits provided an aesthetic return to form for City after the previous years gradiating orange/white home shirt shocker, and the mark II Hinchliffe crest (not Avec’s doing) was the only blemish on an otherwise lovely uniform set.

Les Motherby

Filed under: Kit Reviews — Les @ 6:13 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



Older Posts »

Subscribe

In Good Nick

Tomb Rater

Kick in the Cock

Watch Amber Nectar on YouTube

Hull City Kits

Last Result
City 0-1 Crawley
Next Match
v Doncaster (Jan 31st)
Player Ratings
Better than Waggy
Aaron Mclean7.2
James Chester7.0
Robert Koren6.8
Paul McKenna6.8
Tom Cairney6.7

As Bad as Bamber
Péter Gulácsi6.1
Andy Dawson6.2
Matt Fryatt6.2
Ratings up to Jan 28th

We Love Justin
We Love Justin

AN on Facebook
Visit us on Facebook

Powered by WordPress



As Featured on News Now





Buy shit you don't need or buy us bandwidth