August 8, 2002

Did it ever really go away?


Finally, the void in all our lives is filled, the three-month torture we must endure every summer is at an end. Cricket is a very fine sport, but nothing can replicate Hull City. And so, like the magnificent tiger stretching itself out in the evening sun and preparing itself for a long and exciting evening of slaying smaller and weaker prey, the Tigers of Hull City limber themselves up for an assault on the Third Division championship.

For a change, the bid for glory begins in our lair – City are rarely permitted the luxury of a opening day match at Boothferry Park. Southend are the prey, the quivering deer to Hull City’s formidable hunting beast. At least, that’s the theory, for even the deer can escape the murderous advances of the beast. It happened too many times last season, and new gamekeeper Jan Molby is charged with ensuring with restoring the natural order to the reserve. He has made an encouraging start. The animal looks slicker, leaner, hungrier, the desire to hunt present once again. It’s even forsaken its old poisoned watering holes.

All seven new signings look set to make their City debuts. Richie Appleby, Stuart Green, Stuart Elliott, Greg Strong, Shaun Smith, John Anderson and Ian Ashbee are all fit to play and have all had encouraging pre-seasons. With a new 4-3-3 formation, money to spend and interest in the club absurdly high, how can we fail? January 2002 provides all the answers to that question, and even though this feels different, we’ve said it so often before, been here so many times, a note of caution simply has to be struck.

Southend are no mugs. If we play well, we’ll roll them over. Anything else, and we’ll be made to look slightly foolish. In Tes Bramble and Graeme Jones (the crocked Wigan player Buchanan liked to pretend we were signing), they have a potentially good strikeforce. Additionally, we’ve not beaten them at home for eighteen years – they’ve frustrated us here four times in recent seasons. Southend have won their last opening day games. They’re a team who could conceivably push for a play-off place, or have everything click and sneak into the top three.

The bookies are naturally expecting big things – City are as short as 3/1 for the title, 8/13 to get promoted and a colossal 80/1 to go down. Two of the top three favourites for top scorer ply their trade in East Yorkshire. City are 8/15 to to roll Southend over, short odds indeed. With a crowd comfortably in five figures expected to flood into Boothferry Park and a record number of season tickets sold, it’s not hard to get carried away.

So let’s get carried away. This is our season godammit, the year in which it all finally comes right. It WILL all go right. This time, there will no escape for the weak and defenceless. The Tiger will finally have its day. Come on you Hull.

Filed under: Articles,Match Previews — Andy @ 5:56 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



May 13, 2002

AGAINST ALL ODDS: City named as favourites, again


City have been named as favourites to win the Third Division next season by bookmakers Victor Chandler. The Tigers are 6/1 to claim the 2002/3 championship. Last season, City were 4/1 favourites, but of course finished miles behind surprise winners Plymouth. Defeated play-off finalists Rushden are second favourites (7/1), Kidderminster are rather surprisingly third (8/1) then Bournemouth and Scunthorpe at 11/1. Conference champions Boston are rated as 20/1 shots, York at 25/1, play-off semi-final losers Rochdale and Hartlepool both at 14/1. Tipped to struggle are outsiders Exeter, Torquay, Carlisle and financially crippled Lincoln, all 40/1.

Filed under: Against All Odds — Andy @ 2:28 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



May 11, 2002

NEWS: Larkin bid rejected


City have had a £100,000 bid for Wolves’ Colin Larkin rejected. Dave Jones has confirmed that City have submitted a bid for the player, which was not accepted. Larkin spent much of last season at Kidderminster, where he clearly impressed Jan Molby. He scored seven goals for the Harriers during his seven and a half months at Aggborough. The 20 year Irishman has been at Wolves for four years, and represented his country at Under 18 level.

Filed under: News — Andy @ 5:11 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



March 18, 2002

I don’t like cricket…nor do I love it


Religious intolerance, it’s the in thing. Despite the protestations that religion is not part of the equation, battle lines are being drawn the world over as Christianity and Muslimism prepare to slug it out in a televised fight for supremacy.

Meanwhile on a green pastured island, Catholic schoolgirls are heckled as they walk to school, alleged to be part of some dastardly papal plot.

Under such circumstances, it’s perhaps not surprising that many choose not to have a faith at all, surely that will insulate them against any abuse? Ha! Think again, it certainly hasn’t helped me, as time and again I have been contemptuously branded an atheist. Why?

Well you see, I don’t appreciate ‘God’s game’, I am in short, a cricketing infidel. Sorry, but it’s just not my game. Football, now there is a sport I can live and breathe on, I play, I watch, I talk about it interminably, but change the topic to cricket and it all goes quiet over here.

It’s not just watching cricket I dislike, but playing it too, I’ve never found it particularly enjoyable. I remember playing at school, it took me twenty minutes to get the sodding padding on, only to spend little more than a nanosecond at the crease. Out for a duck, not a Golden duck mind, but rather humiliating nonetheless as I hacked despairingly with the bat as the ball bounced beyond me, the sound of bails tumbling telling me my ordeal was over after just two balls.

My earliest experience at a cricket crease had nothing to do with playing the game though, and perhaps it explains my reticence to revisit one. On the school field near my childhood home, there was a concrete crease with an Astroturf carpet laid atop of it. Some older boys thought it a wheeze to knock me on the floor and then roll me up in the turf. Once fully rolled up, they decided to rain down kicks and elbow smashes as I lay mummified in a cricket pitch, (how surreal does that sound?). I didn’t really feel the impact of the blows, but each one knocked sand from the ersatz grass into my eyes, hair, ears, every fucking place short of my foreskin, I was saturated by the stuff. They then got bored and decided to leave me for a few hours, hoho, how fun that was.

That probably left a traumatic association with cricket, but that’s only a subconscious issue. My main dislike, and I know people will wince at this one, is the sheer boredom factor. The game takes so bloody long, and with so much time between plays worthy of merit. Now before you accuse me of having an attention span akin to that of a gadfly, that is not the case. I’m not like an American sports spectator who needs breaks in play every 20 seconds so I can refuel on ale and food of dubious calorific content in order to pay attention for 7 successive seconds.

I have no problem paying rapt attention to the 45 minute periods in football, but it’s impossible to pay complete attention to cricket, why would you want to watch intently as the bowler ambles off, staining his trousers in the groinal region as he goes, before turning, jogging to the crease and delivering a ball that will invariably bounce harmlessly beyond the batsman or will be bunted pathetically, but theatrically (as if real artistry is involved) a few feet in front of said batsman.

Then the whole process is repeated, again, and again, until something remotely interesting happens and people cry ‘how is that’ in an inaudible manner, waking the umpire who missed the whole thing because he was getting a sly 40 winks in. ZZZZZzzzzzz. Unless of course you’re watching on television and you have the same StepStone.com advert repeated between every over to spice up the monotony with a different kind of monotony. And the games take sooooooo bloody long. How can you play for 5 days, like in the recent Australia and New Zealand test, and have no conclusion? To me, that’s just not right.

The one-day game, now that has a limited appeal, there is a time limit, therefore a real sense of purpose. But even then, handlebar moustachioed purists brand that derivation of the ‘real game’ apocryphal. Ok, I can understand the dislike of the Day-Glo kits worn, and what are the team names all about? Phoenix? Yeah, I see lots of fiery birds ascending from ashes in Yorkshire. The one-day game I can just about tolerate, and apparently I’ll love it when I finally relent and attend a match.

But even the one-day game has the same drawbacks as it’s protracted progenitor. It’s such a fragile thing, hamstrung by the merest hint of inclement weather, “oh no, bad light”, “oh no, it’s raining”, “ah the weather is fine now, but let’s not play anyway as it’s time for tea”. Arrgghhh!

The terminology, that scares me. What is a googly? And how can a wicket be sticky? No, don’t explain it, I really don’t want to know.

My pals, ever trying to tempt me to a game, realise lauding the sport’s subtle nuances isn’t going to sway me, so they trumpet the opportunity of an all day drinking spree in accompaniment to a game, all well and good, but I’m perfectly capable of getting pissed at my local, staring at the walls from time to time for visual boredom.

There is one aspect of cricket that does appeal to me however, and that is the county association. Born in Hull, I’m forever being branded a Humbersider by out of town friends, something they know irritates the hell out of me. Having an active interest in cricket would allow me to play the Yorkshire card I suppose, but then considering their recent success in the County Championship, attaching myself to them now would surely see me branded a glory hunter.

No, it’s just not going to happen, it’s just not, well it is cricket I suppose, but it’s not my cup of tea. I accept this, if only my cricket aficionado associates would too. No matter how bright the light you shine in my face, I’m not going to see it. A cricketing atheist I’ll stay. Hallelujah.


Les Motherby

Filed under: Articles — Les @ 10:07 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



January 18, 2002

PREVIEW: City v Exeter


Now comes the backlash, right? I mean, when you’re pride is as wounded as ours, you go out and show the world just how good you are. Right?

Well, if we’re to get the season back on track, that’s what needs to happen. And the recovery must begin with the visit of Exeter City tomorrow. City are embarking upon their most hectic part of the season – by February 9th we’ll have played 10 games in 32 days. To have a bad spell at this stage could be disastrous. To recover and end this part of 2001/2 with a series of wins would be invaluable. Exeter at home isn’t the sternest test City will face this season, and it represents an ideal chance to rectify the events of the past week.

Not that Exeter should be underestimated. They’ve won their last four away games, emerging victorious from trips to Torquay, Shrewsbury, Mansfield and most recently Scunthorpe, a 95th minute winner from Roscoe stealing all three points from the Scunts. If their home form was as impressive as their away form, they’d be serious contenders for a top five finish. However, results at St James’ Park (the real one) have consistently let them down. Of course, their season started off in the worst possible way, with a 3-1 gubbing at home to the Tigers. Oh, for those heady days to be revisited. Nonetheless, the Grecians are a revitalised side, and will be scenting tigerish blood at the moment.

Happily for Little’s demoralised troops, the visitors are also pretty charitable in defence. They’ve leaked 42 goals this season, the same as Dolan’s pitiful York and bettered only by Orient’s remarkable 47-goal against tally. It’s a great chance for the struggling strikers to get a goal, and you fancy that if City can score once more will follow. On that point Little is correct – even a fluke will do, and the length of time it takes for City to score their next goal might have a huge bearing on the outcome of the this season.

The Tigers will need to beat their southern foes without the aid of Ian Goodison, sidelined with a leg injury. He is seemingly not long for this club, with he and compatriot Theodore Whitmore having rejected recent contract offers from City. Their current deals expire in summer but City are prepared to listen to any offers made for the pair, and we may be seeing the final acts of their Hull City careers. Whether Whitmore will even be given the opportunity to impress any other clubs watching on Saturday is doubtful – his shocking performance on Tuesday may see him dropped. Just what formation and team selection will be made is anyone’s guess, but several players will be fearing the worst. Matthews, Sneekes, Beresford, Rowe, Whitmore, Greaves and Johnsson’s places are all under severe threat. Hopefully, Little will restore Dudfield to the starting eleven, but not even the smallest of hints have been dropped in the build-up to the game.

The bookies have lost faith in City too, pricing them as high as 12/1 for the title. In the minds of all but the most optimistic of supporters any chance of the championship has now gone, with the chase for third place being our primary target. Fortunately, City’s recent form (eight points from a possible thirty) has not been capitalised upon by our promotion rivals. (BR)Mansfield have lost three of their last four, Rochdale have just one win in eight, Scunthorpe have taken seven points from a possible 18. The sudden collapse of so many teams has let in other contenders, notably Shrewsbury, Kidderminster, Cheltenham and now Exeter. Assuming Luton and Plymouth have already sewn up the top two, City face a fearsome battle for the third and final automatic promotion spot. If it’s any solace, City remain comfortable 9/4 favourites to emerge victorious from this impending scrap. They’re also 4/6 to take three points tomorrow.

Tough times lie ahead, and we’ll learn an awful lot about our expensive team in the next few months. Do they have the ability and determination to secure promotion? We can only hope they do. COME ON CITY!

Filed under: Match Previews — Andy @ 8:34 am

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



January 15, 2002

MATCH REPORT: City 0-1 Carlisle


Pathetic. Appalling. Inexcusable. Disgraceful. Unforgivable.

It somehow seems apt to kick off this match report with a few adjectives to describe just what happened at Boothferry Park on January 15th 2002. Because what follows is as grim and depressing as anything the Tiger Nation has had to endure during a bleak decade of following Hull City.

Today, Hull City surrendered their year-long unbeaten home record to a team lying 23rd in the league, without an away win in seven months. Sound bad? There’s more to follow.

Brian Little made the latest in a long line of inexplicable team changes, yet again dropping our best player of the season, Lawrie Dudfield. City at least lined up with a 4-4-2, replacing the idiotic 5-3-2 which guaranteed defeat at Plymouth. Musselwhite; Petty, Edwards, Whittle, Wicks; Whitmore, Sneekes, Beresford, Matthews; Rowe and Alexander was the team. And boy, did they fail. But before launching into a full examination of our failings, a brief synopsis of the match.

City came out, and performed a Celtic-style huddle before the game. It seemed to briefly work, as they immediately took the upper hand, taking total control and fashioning several half-chances. Then after 9 minutes Carlisle got a free-kick on their right and whipped the ball in. Some pathetically poor defending allowed the ball to continue across it’s path across the area, where a completely unmarked Foran neatly tucked it away. The next five minutes saw a vaguely spirited response; the rest of the game was an insult to the 8,526 who had paid good money to watch City.

That’s the match report done, for neither team created any chances of note during the remainder of the game. Even a desperate treble-substitution made sod-all difference. So, having dispensed with the formalities, let’s examine how City fared.

Fucking terrible. They were booed off at half-time, and the full-time reaction was as hostile as anything seen at Boothferry Park in the last ten years. A total absence of passion was primarily at fault. Barring Mike Edwards and Paul Musselwhite, every single player on the pitch was guilty of personal and professional cowardice. Passes were constantly astray, players were failing to meet the ball, the simplest of tackles were shirked, the easiest of tasks repeatedly fucked up by a team that simply did not give a shit.

No doubt Little will defend his players in the press, saying how they tried their hardest and had most of the ball. Well, that’s bollocks. Total shite. Every time City had a decent chance to create anything the players bottled it. It was witless, clueless, passionless – Dolan would have been proud.

The positives? It was only 1-0. Musselwhite pulled of a great save to deny a one-on-one chance midway through the second half, while Edwards made an impressive return to the side, looking eager for the ball and actually appearing to want to win. Everyone else, take note.

The negatives? Too many to mention. The crowd, restless and quite understandably livid as the game progressed, numbered just 8,526. How many of those will return for the home match against Exeter on Saturday is anyone’s guess. If more than 8,000 appear, it’ll be a surprise. Adam Pearson, presumably as furious as anyone by the abject display, held his head in his hands as the attendance was read out. We need to attract more fans, yet spineless shows like that are simply going to drive away the casual supporter. £13 to watch that shower of shite? No chance.

Once Carlisle had scored, against the run of play, the game was up. City had neither the intelligence nor the sheer willpower to reverse the deficit. Almost to a man, they gave up. I have seen many dismal performances watching City over the past ten years or so. The 1-0 defeat at Doncaster remains the worse; the 1-0 home defeat to Kettering in the Cup last season takes second place. The defeat against Carlisle challenged, if not superceded, both games. We were THAT bad. Even the worst of the Dolan years were superior fare to that. City reached a new low against Carlisle, a miserable feeling we thought we’d never experience again.

So, what to do? Simple. Several players should be dropped, with immediate and lasting effect. Matthews, Beresford, Petty and Whitmore were clueless. None should play for City on Saturday. Why the fuck was Dudfield on the bench? He’s been our best player this season – quite why Little dropped him is something only he can fathom. Gary Bradshaw and Matt Bloomer should both be played on Saturday. Both have impressed in the reserves, both appear to show pride in the amber and black shirt they wear.

The second half was pure torture for every single City fan in the ground. Christ only knows what Little said at half-time, but he utterly failed to motivate his side to do anything about the situation they found themselves in. If he cannot get this expensively-assembled side to perform, then he should step aside for someone who can. It was THAT bad. Questioning the manager is not something we do lightly, but such a dereliction of duty by his players merits a severe examination of the state Hull City AFC are in. We never looked remotely like scoring, Beresford in particular wasting possession time after time.

Full-time finally arrived, and the team was subjected to a show of disgust not seen since Hateley’s days. Today, Hull City hit a low point not seen in several years. Urgent action is needed to rescue the season, before even the play-offs are out of reach. Pearson has invested countless thousands into giving us a team we can be proud of. Currently, the manager and particularly the players are betraying his and our faith. If their contracts allowed it, Pearson should fine each and every player a month’s wages, with the proceeds going towards a local charity. Sadly, they’ll no doubt get away with it, which is a travesty. If any of the players are reading this, you should be ashamed of yourselves. Quite how you can look yourselves in the mirror is beyond me. Travelling 700 miles to watch the surrender at Plymouth is bad enough – watching it on our own doorstep against the likes of Carlisle is simply taking the piss. Do the decent thing, and give away your wages, because you’ve not earned them this month. You are not fit to wear those shirts.

Filed under: Match Reports — Andy @ 7:30 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



January 12, 2002

MATCH REPORT: Plymouth 1-0 City


City practically handed Plymouth the Division Three championship and damaged their own promotion push with another abject away performance. The Tigers had a chance to cut the Pilgrims 11 point lead over us to a more assailable 8 but conspired to let them increase it to a surely uncatchable 14 points in a spineless and gutless display that just took the piss out of the 600+ Tiger Nationals who made the trek from East Yorkshire to Devon. After filing into the impressively refurbished Home Park, many of them were questioning Brian Little’s sanity when the team sheet was read out, as both wingers, Beresford and Williams, were relegated to the bench leaving a sparsely populated midfield of Greaves, Johnsson and Whitmore. Playing five at the back, Petty, Whittle, Goodison, Holt and a debutant Wicks left City with practically no width on one of the widest pitches in the division, and therefore no service to Alexander and Dudfield.

The plan was obviously to settle for a point, and for the first 15 minutes or so we were resolute as the Greens tested us, but then it all went wrong, the Greens pushed an extra man into midfield and their five washed over our three with ease. Paul Musselwhite denied the improbably named Marino Keith not long before Paul Stoneman took advantage of collective lax defending, heading a flicked on corner kick past a helpless Mussy from close range on 20 minutes. On an unsavoury note, it was quite surprising considering that before the game there was this big song and dance routine during which a Plymouth official gave a twee monologue praising the good behavior of their fans to see a group of them directing Nazi salutes at us when they scored. Fair play to the stewards though, they waited until half time and then hauled out one of the main protagonists of this repulsive act with minimal fuss.

(more…)

Filed under: Match Reports — Les @ 10:22 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



January 11, 2002

NEWS: Wicks to Hull/Lee’s a Gull


City have signed Brighton defender Matthew Wicks in a player swap deal. The 23 year old played a major role in their promotion last season, but joins the Tigers having slid out of the Seagull’s first XI. A left-footed centre-half, he adds to the fierce competition for places in the defence.

Going in the opposite direction is David Lee. He has joins the Withdean Stadium outfit after failing to establish himself in the City’s first team. Despite making a handful of appearances early in the season, and scoring a stunning goal from a free kick against York, he has rarely made the squad. Some suggest this may be due to alleged drunken antics with other similarly out of favour players.

No fee has been paid by either club – the deal is a straight swap. Wicks joined Brighton from Peterborough for £25,000, and put in a series of impressive displays under former manager Micky Adams. However, new boss Peter Taylor has rarely included him, prompting him to make the move up north.

Filed under: News — Andy @ 1:16 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



January 4, 2002

NEWS: Carlisle game POSTPONED


The game against Carlisle has been postponed. A 2pm pitch inspection was held at Boothferry Park, but revealed that conditions were too bad to allow the game to go ahead. The postponement has cost City the £30,000 ITV were going to pay for televising the game live, and means City have yet another fixture to rearrange.

Filed under: News — Andy @ 9:15 am

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



January 3, 2002

PREVIEW: City v Carlisle


Needless to say, this preview takes the assumption that Boothferry Park will be passed as playable for the match on Friday night. The pitch is in perfect condition, as always, but a covering of snow on top of the covers and problems with ice and snow on the terraces and approaches to the ground mean the game remains in doubt. City are confident the game will go ahead. Should it not, the club will lose the £30,000 ITV are paying to show the match live on their Sport Channel. A pitch inspection will take place at 2.30pm on the afternoon of the match.

As for game itself, on paper, it looks like on of the easiest of the season. Carlisle’s form this season has been awful, and only Halifax are saving them from being bottom of the league. Without a single away win all season, they come into the game having lost 3-1 at Rushden. The freezing conditions over the Christmas period affected them more than most, as they haven’t played a game since that reversal at Nene Park, on December 22nd. At least the Cumbrians have no particular injury worries, and can welcome back McDonagh, Rogers, Hopper and Birch from suspension. The primary danger comes from Richie Foran, who has plundered 6 of Carlisle’s 19 goals this season. He is a robust forward with considerable pace and a impressive mean streak that makes him a handful for any defence.

City have no concerns on the injury front. New signing Jason Ven Blerk is likely to go straight into the squad, hopefully to replace Andy Holt at left-back. Justin Whittle’s suspension has been served, and he will probably take Mohan’s place in the defence. Sneekes should retain his place in the side after his one-man show at Kidderminster, while Dudfield is certain to return to the side following his puzzling relegation to the bench last week. It means Whitmore’s place is under threat, as Little is likely to favour Johnsson and Sneekes in midfield. Matthews and Beresford will play out wide, Alexander is undroppable up front, while Musselwhite will keep his place ahead of former Carlisle player Matt Glennon, who is still suffering with a thigh injury.

City have developed an annoying habit of not winning games like these of late. Carlisle are unlikely to be too adventurous coming forward, meaning City will have to break down yet another stubborn defence at home. The Tigers are 4/9 to overcome their TV jinx, and really need to win in order to keep in touch with Luton and Plymouth, who are starting to run away with it at the top of the table. With Mansfield playing in the FA Cup at Leicester on Saturday, a win will take the Tigers back into the top three. After the disgrace at Kidderminster, a massive improvement is required. Come on you Ull.
Recommended viewing: www.bruntonpark.com

Filed under: Match Previews — Andy @ 1:12 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums



« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Subscribe

In Good Nick

Tomb Rater

Kick in the Cock

Watch Amber Nectar on YouTube

Hull City Kits

Last Result
West Ham 2-1 City
Next Match
next season...
Player Ratings
Better than Waggy
James Chester7.0
Aaron Mclean6.9
Robert Koren6.8
Tom Cairney6.8
Jack Hobbs6.8

As Bad as Bamber
Péter Gulácsi6.1
Cameron Stewart6.1
Josh King6.2
Final 2011/12 ratings

We Love Justin
We Love Justin

AN on Facebook
Visit us on Facebook

Powered by WordPress



As Featured on News Now





Buy shit you don't need or buy us bandwidth