October 20, 2014

Things We Think We Think #158


1. A good week on the pitch and – rarely – off it as well. Off field first, and City’s accounts were good news, in both tone and content. Tone because the club was pretty open about its figures, explaining that they were perhaps not as good as the headline profit may have suggested and stressing that the summer’s whopping transfer commitments were not included. And in content because they show the club breaking even and living broadly within its means.

2. There are flies in the ointment, of course. The debt is stable, to our considerable relief, but it is still frightening large. It’d be interesting to hear what plans the club have to bring this down in the coming years. The SMC’s performance is a concern too. Nonetheless, neither represent an immediate threat to the club’s future, and for that we congratulate the owners.

3. Needless to say, if Hull City AFC are making a profit, the need to call them something else is zero. Exactly the same as before, in fact.

4. Now, to the game at Arsenal. City were terrific weren’t they? Not that Match Of The Day noticed (their one-eyed view of the game both in commentary and analysis was sick-making and pathetic) but the elongated period when Steve Bruce’s side led the match was thoroughly deserved and had it ended in a repeat scoreline of the win at the Emirates just over six years ago, nobody would have had a right to complain.

5. Arsenal still did complain, of course, indulged by a national media that cannot see beyond the fortunes and pitfalls of “big” clubs. The Gunners had a point when looking at Mohamed Diamé’s rather robust way of getting opponents out of the way on his path to goal, but nevertheless their endless bleating and woe-is-me posturing is most unsavoury and we find ourselves simply ceasing to care.

6. We have managed to concede a lot of late goals this season, mind. This could be coincidence but it should be at least a mild cause for worry. The games at Newcastle and now Arsenal, at home to Stoke and in the League Cup at West Bromwich Albion have all seen City drop points or sacrifice places in hats when victory was just moments away. Whether it’s fitness, focus or concentration we don’t know, but it’d be nice to have it stop.

7. There’s suddenly a minor injury crisis at the Circle. Our first two keepers are out after Arsenal, as could be our most expensive defender and our top scorer. It’s not a jolly thought that Eldin Jakupović could be in the starting line-up at Anfield next week, while opportunity suddenly knocks again for Paul McShane or Alex Bruce, and possibly Sone Aluko. This is why we have a squad, but that squad has to respond when misfortune befalls the first choice player.

8. By the way, Mr Motson, that’s Eldin Jakupović. Just in case you get to slum it in our presence again.

9. It won’t be easy at Liverpool, of course, but they aren’t at all reminiscent of the flowing, progressive and genuinely entertaining team of the post-Christmas half of last season that nearly passed its way to the Premier League title. There is a chance for City there which is clear and obvious. And while we’ve nothing against baby Bruce, it’s be nice to see McShane chosen as the one to wind up Mario Balotelli, assuming Dawson doesn’t make it back.

10. City are now 6/1 to be relegated, longer odds than eight other clubs and rarely feature in any analysis of the contenders for the bottom three. Our current points-per-game would extrapolate to 47½ over the season whole season, which would be approaching ten more than enough to stay up. It’s far far too early to stop worrying about it – after all, 6/1 is the same price City were to win at Arsenal, and that so nearly happened. But are we allowed to start looking up rather than down yet?

Filed under: Opinion — Amber Nectar @ 7:15 am

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums

October 13, 2014

Things We Think We Think #157


1. Something of a bolt from the blue was Nikica Jelavić’s surprising decision to retire from international football over the weekend. With Croatia likely to qualify for Euro 2016 and the player still in his 20s (and perhaps the form of his life), he’s effectively giving up playing in a major tournament, and perhaps two. It wouldn’t be a total shock if this decision is reversed in the coming months.

2. Quite a few City fans seem pleased about Jelavić putting club before country. Yet don’t we all want Curtis Davies and Tom Huddlestone to play for England?

3. Meanwhile, Andy Robertson’s stellar rise continued with a sparkling performance for Scotland against Georgia. We’d better enjoy him while we can.

4. Arsenal this weekend. Expect to hear southern dullards intoning “two niw, and you facked it ap”, as though that’ll somehow distress us. At least they’re charging a vaguely sensible amount for the game. It’d be nice to put one over them too. The Cup Final aside, memories of Arsenal are inevitably centred upon that afternoon in 2008 when City pulled off perhaps the biggest shock in the Premier League’s history; but we’ve since lost seven in a row to Arsenal. Some close, some controversial, and of course they have resources far beyond ours so there’s no real shame in that record – but it’d be good to see Arsène Wenger fumbling around for scapegoats next Saturday night.

5. Six months ago, we’d probably have been furious at Assem Allam blaming the fans for his unhappy situation – facing a second defeat on the name change and likely to sell a club he’d rather keep. Now we’re just thoroughly bored of his increasingly desperate cries for attention.

6. About that sale, then. Assem Allam’s relationship with the fans is worsening, and already significant numbers are irreparably alienated from the owner. Those numbers are only going to increase unless Mr Allam stops talking and starts keeping promises. Past form suggests that’s unlikely. Which makes us think, reluctantly and for the first time, that perhaps him selling the club and us all moving on may be the best thing for all concerned.

7. Stephen Parnaby, eh? He and his fellow political pygmy Steve Brady’s recent border spat doesn’t trouble us; AN doesn’t do politics. Whether the leader of East Riding Council should be using council time and public money to fawn over Assem Allam is a matter for his electorate to judge; it’s plainly not illegal and doesn’t require banning. Nor is an East Riding politician somehow less qualified to comment upon City than a Hull-based politician, because City’s support being drawn from the East Riding as well as Hull has long been evident.

8. What trouble us are his opinions. If he wants to gush about Assem Allam, well, fine. But his clarification to Radio Humberside that he would support Assem Allam in changing City’s name is something else. Again, it’s a view he’s entitled to have. Whether it’s wise for a politician to side against the majority of City fans is anyone’s guess. But it places him firmly in the minority, and firmly opposed to all known facts and figures.

9. We don’t need to wonder why so many politicians seek embarrassingly anxious to genuflect towards Mr Allam. The linguistically disadvantaged John Prescott is another, while Cllr Mike Whitehead – a PPC in Hull next year – also joins in…though the second does at least support the club. No, it’s fairly straightforward. Politicians crave the approval of the rich and the powerful. And sod the ordinary fan.

10. An interesting notion popped up on Twitter during the week – an account campaigning for a monument to Ebenezer Cobb Morley, the Hull-born father of association football. We wish him/her well. Campaigns of this nature aren’t easy, as we well remember from both City Till We Die and the attempts to make West Yorkshire Police see sense last year, but with enough application and organisation they can certainly yield results, as both of these squabbles illustrate.

Filed under: Opinion — Amber Nectar @ 6:57 am

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums

October 7, 2014


Filed under: Podcasts — Amber Nectar @ 9:03 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums

October 6, 2014

Things We Think We Think #156


1. The victory over Crystal Palace wasn’t thrilling or stellar, but it was pretty assured. Palace arrived in good form but were comfortably outplayed all over the pitch. The first half was a little bit erratic, with Colin’s Palace successfully stifling City, but in the second half the pace was upped and Palace were eventually well beaten. Played, City.

2. Correlation does not imply causation, but City’s first League win and first clean sheet in a while all arrived on the same day that James Chester was restored to the side and 3-5-2 was resurrected. It could be a coincidence, but it didn’t really feel like one. Steve Bruce has more than earned the right to change the formation and personnel if he sees fit, but one thing the manager has already done well is correct himself if it isn’t really working. A Chester-less 4-4-2 wasn’t really going badly awry and we were close to pulling off a few results under it, worth remembering for the future, but an enChestered 3-5-2 just felt better.

3. So, impressive City, even if we know there’s more to come from the side than we saw on Saturday. But what of Palace? City are a better side and had home advantage, but any side at this level will still regard Hull City away as a winnable fixture. That Palace came seemingly lacking that ambition was very odd. In the first half they ceded possession right up to the halfway line, which made them extremely difficult to break down, but also put them on the back foot to an extent that wasn’t recoverable when they fell behind. Poor stuff from them. But City’s success last season came on the back of putting lesser and equal sides away at home. Encouraging to see that happen once again.

4. We needed it a bit too. A defeat would have left City on 6 points from 7 games, which you’d imagine could have quickly become 6 from 9 with trips to Arsenal and Liverpool approaching. That’s relegation form.

5. City kicked towards the North Stand in the second half against Palace – and with the more partisan supporters now in that area, doesn’t it make sense to do that all the time from now on? It’d have the added bonus of sending visiting teams away from the own fans in the second half too. Win-win…right?

6. Andy Robertson…um, there’s no clause in his contract saying we have to sell him if anyone bids a certain amount, is there?

7. Which is more irksome? The continued haranguing of Fraizer Campbell or the lack of acknowledgement for Damien Delaney, a genuine City hero of the 21st century, whenever either come back to the Circle? Both were prevalent yesterday. Mind you, Campbell did behave like an arse during the game and deserved barracking just for that, not for his past temerity to join other clubs instead of City. It’s daft because he’s a hell of a player, but on Saturday he expended his energy on fouling and whining instead.

8. We won’t waste much of our time or your time on Assem Allam’s Football Focus drivel. We’ve heard this ludicrous untruth-strewn nonsense before, it changes nothing and will not give him a prayer of persuading the FA to change their mind. That they only gave him a minute (from an hour long interview) and then Mark Lawrenson speedily and elegantly knifed his preposterous idea rather said it all. Grandpa Simpson yelling at clouds increasingly springs to mind when we see Mr Allam’s public appearances.

9. Burnley are preparing to charge City fans £37 next month. Football’s autocannibalism nears completion.

10. Meanwhile, a hearty gate for City v Palace. £16 is a good price, one that the club can be proud of offering its fans, and after complaining about £50 against Man C and the subsequent empty seats, it is was pleasing to see immediate proof that pricing football properly will attract support even if the opposition is not of global reknown.

Filed under: Opinion — Amber Nectar @ 7:00 am

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums

October 5, 2014

MATCH REPORT: City 2 – 0 Crystal Palace


If there’s one skill that separates really good footballers from people who merely play football, it’s probably the facility to use the outside of the boot. Sometimes one sees phenomenal skills with the ‘unnatural’ side of the foot from players that they make look easy, then any attempt to replicate it on the playing fields or back gardens of ordinary life usually ends up in a slice, a mishit or an air shot.

Nikica Jelavić clearly has no problem with using the outside of his boot. He scored the second and clinching goal of what was an oddly inconsistent game with the outside of his right foot, prompting those with a half-full glass to rave about the confidence and technique involved, and the rest to whinge that his left foot was clearly not much cop.

It matters not. It was a fine finish at a stage when an enterprising but not especially talented Crystal Palace side were chasing the game, and it gave City a first Premier League win since the opening day. A thoroughly welcome victory too, given recent issues with undermanned defences, overstretched midfields and potty-mouthed owners. (more…)

Filed under: Match Reports — Matt @ 6:45 am

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums

September 30, 2014

NEWS: FA confirm Hull City AFC arbitration


And still the madness continues…

The Football Association have this afternoon confirmed that Hull City AFC is seeking “arbitration” over their attempt to rename the club. The original application was rejected on April 9th after several months of acrimony and widespread opposition among City fans and in the game at large; and while the FA possess “absolute discretion” over such a decision and no right of appeal is thought to exist, sadly Assem Allam has declined to take the decision with good grace and is proceeding with his folly.

This “arbitration” will be confidential and is likely to consume at least a couple of wearying months, ensuring that the owner has presented Steve Bruce with an unwelcome distraction for most of the rest of 2014. The issue ought to be settled: the original rejection came after opposition from City fans, the wider footballing world, Supporters Direct, the Football Supporters’ Federation, the East Riding County FA and the FA itself, all of whom said no.

So what part of “no” does the owner of Hull City AFC not get?

Filed under: News — Andy @ 6:37 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums

September 29, 2014

Things We Think We Think #155


1. We always feared that City would go out of the League Cup weakly and disappointingly, but they almost transcended the City teams of the past on Wednesday night in the way they so blatantly and criminally failed to progress. To be 2-1 up with three minutes to go and still lose, without extra-time being required, was some going even for City.

2. It bruises us to make comments like the above, because more than ever do we want the club, the team and the coaching staff to take the competition seriously. The number of changes to the team and the resultant snatching of defeat, even allowing for its dramatic appearance from the jaws of victory, once again suggests a lackadaisical or casual attitude to any football competition which does not involve the Premier League. To us, the cup competitions represent something we can win, something we can enjoy, something we can nurture, something we can put permanently into our history. That’s twice now that this has been tossed away by club policy and decision-making that puts finishing mid-table in an unwinnable and often unlikeable league ahead of actual glory as a direct consequence of winning football matches.

3. West Bromwich Albion are now going to Bournemouth for a place in the quarter finals. Their fans will have a top night out, their team will probably win – especially as their manager is fighting to prove himself and may see a League Cup run as something to enhance his prospects – and then they’re in the quarter finals. Or alternatively, Bournemouth will be in the quarter finals. That’s Bournemouth. Not City.

4. And given that the Premier League champions were our next visitors, there seemed little sense in removing the momentum from a couple of entertaining and high-scoring, if winless, matches against West Ham and Newcastle by altering the entire team. Manchester City should have been regarded as a free hit and the team Steve Bruce picked should have been motivated to have a pop at them whatever the scenario.

5. While still a defeat, the Man C game waas a little more heartening. City turned around a seemingly hopeless situation in the first half, admittedly aided by an own goal and a penalty, but their recovery reminded us that we are a team with heart and ability.

6. Nikica Jelavić has starred in recent weeks, and seems to be relishing the opportunity to be City’s senior striker. Far from being lost without his intended partner-in-crime Shane Long, he’s flourished of late. His darting runs and work off the ball are a delight to watch, and the addition of goals to his formidable skills make him a serious player at this level.

7. Defensively, how long before Steve Bruce changes things – and to what? Will he go back to 3-5-2 in order to accommodate James Chester back in the side and re-establish the formation we’ve always looked more secure with? Dare he drop England international Michael Dawson? Questions with no obvious answer, but the more the Goals Against tally rises the more pressing they’ll become.

8. We aren’t overburdened with points at the moment, even if the entertainment level is agreeably high. Crystal Palace at home next week is a game we could really do to win, particularly with some fearfully difficult games approaching.

8a. It’d be nice if the score and the time weren’t removed from the scoreboard in the 18th minute as well.

9. There’s been no shortage of complaints about the pricing of the Man C fixture. £50 only makes sense if you’re seeking to extract every possible penny from City fans – and in fairness, there’ll be those at the club whose job that is. But it results in empty seats (bad for the team), is obviously bad for the fans (either ruthlessly fleeced or priced out) and means that City are not representing the community as a whole. It’s a pity because the club has been rightly praised for lowering some matchday prices to just £16, but this simply undoes all of that. Have another think about it, City. For the club’s sake as much as us, because once people are priced out of going they may lose the match-attending habit altogether. And no-one wins if that happens.

10. Assem Allam’s done an interview for Football Focus next Saturday. Our commiserations to those at the club who’ll have to clean up the resulting mess.

Filed under: Opinion — Amber Nectar @ 7:06 am

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums

September 28, 2014

MATCH REPORT: City 2-4 Man City


Two. Two. Three. Four.

By numbers, City’s defence has steadily worsened in recent weeks. It’s cost us two leads, three wins, five Premier League points and qualification to the Fourth Round of the League Cup.

Yet, this one felt significantly less troubling than the rest, even if the quantity of concessions was the greatest yet. Yesterday’s visitors have spent an astonishing sum of money to assemble a dauntingly powerful side, and unlike recent times, we came away have scored our seemingly customary pair of goals without winning, but feeling fairly content.

City made ten changes to the side that slid to a dismaying late defeat at West Brom in midweek, as Steve Bruce carded: McGregor; Rosenior, Davies, Dawson, Robertson; Elmohamady, Livermore, Huddlestone, Diamé; Hernández, Jelavić.


Filed under: Match Reports — Andy @ 5:22 pm

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums

September 24, 2014


Two games to preview, one to review, a natter about Assem Allam’s flawed reasoning for appealing the FA’s decision not to destroy the club’s identity and a knockabout reminiscence about our great county. In which we are the best team. Of course.

Right here…

Filed under: Podcasts — Amber Nectar @ 10:26 am

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums

September 22, 2014

Things We Think We Think #154


1. Ack, how frustrating to engineer a defensive seizure and surrender a two-goal lead at Newcastle United on Saturday. Both goals were eminently preventable not just because better goalkeeping and tighter covering would have been enough to keep the home side at bay, but also because City should have been professional and focussed enough to not panic or worry about being two goals up. It’s not as if we’ve not held on to narrow leads at Newcastle before.

2. Have we really signed Michael Dawson in order to drop James Chester? That feels like a major mistake on the part of the manager (dropping Chester, not signing Dawson) if so. He is paid handsomely to make tough decisions, of course, but our team is a better thing for having a) James Chester in it; and b) three centre backs in total. We’ve got a pair of 2-2 draws with this new structure which while not the worst results in the world, could have been so much better and a paucity of defensive strength at crucial times was key.

3. That first 2-2 draw, against West Ham, was a cracking game of football and we saw two excellent debuts in City colours. Both players scored, contributed extensively and excitingly and looked like marvellous bits of business in an instant.

4. All four goals in the two 2-2 draws were of the very highest quality. We really should get more towering headers, cool side-footers off the post, airborne volleys and blooterers from the edge of the box. They always look good.

5. The dust is still settling on the appalling spectacle of people booing City fans for singing a City song at a City game last week – it has bitterly inflamed tensions between the despairing majority who opposed the name change and the apparently equally despairing minority who fear that that success may drive away Assem Allam. But with City Till We Die classily seeking to downplay things, it’s worth looking a few months ahead at how we’re all going to have to get along again.

6. Citing two non-league clubs that are for quite obvious reasons exempt from Premier League rules, when saying Hull City’s name change application was treated with bias, that’s pretty feeble grounds for an appeal, isn’t it?

7. The club being angry that fans were given a say in the matter speaks volumes about what our owners really think of paying customers and the community they said they wanted to preserve the club for, doesn’t it?

8. The FA will surely soon clarify, but we’re pretty sure the club has no right of appeal, and that furthermore, they’ve known that since the decision was made.  So, what was the real intention of that press conference?

9. Soon, Assem Allam’s appeal to change the name will fail. We don’t expect him to respond with anything approaching grace or dignity, but we have no influence over that and for now it doesn’t really concern us anyway; what matters is how divisions in the stands are repaired. Towards the very end of the recent Scottish independence referendum, it dawned upon political leaders that they were all going to have to live in the same country, free of the UK or not, and there was a noticeable movement to reach out to the other side after weeks of increasing rancour. Perhaps we can do the same. When Allam’s appeal fails, there’ll be some City fans who wrongly but genuinely think that administration, League 8 and all that is the inevitable consequence. Maybe we ought not be too hard on them. It won’t be easy knowing you backed the wrong horse for the wrong reasons – we still encounter people who look sheepishly away when we mention Nick Buchanan and Stephen Hinchliffe, having backed them right until the final disturbing revelations while we’d loudly doubted them for some time. However, if we want to be friends again, incessant gloating won’t help in the aftermath of the FA’s second rejection. The name will stay the same, the Allams will eventually sell up (owners always do) and we’ll find new issues to exercise us. Soon, this will all be history. For their part, try to understand that our love of the name Hull City AFC is absolutely sincere, non-negotiable, and – most importantly – a TOTALLY separate issue to Assem Allam’s ownership of the club. And for God’s sake, don’t boo City songs. That’s best left to Leeds fans.

10. West Brom in the League Cup on Wednesday. Plenty at City say they want to get back into Europe, and right what felt like a wrong against KSC Lokeren last month, which is heartening. We therefore look forward to City’s strongest XI taking to the field at the Hawthorns.

Filed under: Opinion — Amber Nectar @ 10:54 am

Discuss this and more in the Tiger Nation Forums

Older Posts »


Bruce Alrighty?

Tomb Rater

Kick in the Cock

Watch Amber Nectar on YouTube

Hull City Kits

Last Result
Arsenal 2 City 2
Next Match
v Liverpool (Oct 25)
Player Ratings
Better than Waggy
Andrew Robertson8.0
Stephen Quinn7.5
James Chester7.1
David Meyler6.8
Yannick Sagbo6.8

As Bad as Bamber
Robbie Brady5.0
Alex Bruce5.8
Shane Long6.0
Ratings up to Aug 21st

We Love Justin
We Love Justin

AN on Facebook
Visit us on Facebook

Powered by WordPress

As Featured on News Now

Buy shit you don't need or buy us bandwidth